From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Supina

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 22, 1970
428 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 24718.

June 22, 1970.

W. Edward Morgan, (argued) Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.

Joe Jencks, (argued) Asst. U.S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U.S. Atty., Jo Ann D. Diamos, Asst. U.S. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, District Judge.

Honorable Philip C. Wilkins, United States District Judge, Sacramento, California, sitting by designation.


The judgment of conviction against Philip Dale Supina for refusing to submit to induction (50 U.S.C.App. § 462) is reversed.

The record discloses that this is another one of those cases in which the registrant was processed for induction as a "delinquent" by his Local Board after he failed to report for his physical examination. United States v. Stow, 427 F.2d 891 (9th Cir. filed May 27, 1970); see United States v. Broyles, 427 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. filed June 8, 1970); United States v. Thomas, 422 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1970).


Summaries of

United States v. Supina

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 22, 1970
428 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

United States v. Supina

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip Dale SUPINA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 22, 1970

Citations

428 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

United States v. Pennington

When the record is thus inconclusive, a line of cases in this circuit has assumed acceleration and therefore…

United States v. Kohls

Because Kohls was processed for induction as a "delinquent" for failure to complete his physical examination,…