Opinion
21-7556
06-27-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TIMOTHY STINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Timothy Stinson, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 26, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cr-00341-RJC-DCK-1)
Timothy Stinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Stinson appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Stinson's motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021); see also United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 189 (4th Cir. 2021) (affirming denial of compassionate release where "[t]he court's rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate under [18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)]" and "the court sufficiently explained its denial to allow for meaningful appellate review" (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Stinson, No. 3:18-cr-00341-RJC-DCK-1 (W.D. N.C. Oct. 22, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED