From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Steele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina
Apr 11, 2012
Case No: 3:01CR216-11 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 3:01CR216-11 USM No: 21053-057

04-11-2012

United States of America v. GERALD LAMONT STEELE

Ross Richardson Defendant's Attorney


Date of Original Judgment: July 22, 2003

Date of Last Amended Judgment: N/A

Ross Richardson

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [X] the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[X] DENIED. [] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of ____________ is reduced to ____________

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Original Offense Level: 35 Amended Offense Level: 29

Criminal History Category: IV Criminal History Category: IV

Original Guideline Range: 240 months Amended Guideline Range: 240 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range.

Other (explain): Due to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence required in this case, there is no change in the guideline calculations.

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated July 22, 2003, shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: ____________

(if different from order date)

Max O. Cogburn Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Steele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina
Apr 11, 2012
Case No: 3:01CR216-11 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Steele

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. GERALD LAMONT STEELE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

Case No: 3:01CR216-11 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2012)