From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stargell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Apr 26, 2016
Cause No. 1:11-cr-0209-SEB-MJD-1 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 26, 2016)

Opinion

Cause No. 1:11-cr-0209-SEB-MJD-1

04-26-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERESA STARGELL, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 17, 2016 and April 19, 2016, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on January 28, 2016 and a supplemental petition dated April 6, 2016. Defendant Stargell appeared in person with her appointed counsel Michael Donahoe. The government appeared by James Warden, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Ross Carothers.

The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:

1. The Court advised Defendant Stargell of her rights and provided her with a copy of the petition. Defendant Stargell waived her right to a preliminary hearing.

2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Stargell admitted violations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the petition and violations 7, and 8 of the supplemental petition. [Docket Nos. 24 and 33.]

3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the petition, are:

ViolationNumber

Nature of Noncompliance

1

"The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlledsubstance."

2

"The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall notpurchase, posses, use, distribute, or administer any controlledsubstance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances,except as prescribed by a physician."

3

"The defendant shall not frequent places where controlled substancesare illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered."

On June 29, 2015, a urine sample was collected and tested negative for illicitsubstances. However, the offender stated she had recently relapsed by usingheroin and was traveling daily to a methadone clinic in Indianapolis. Theoffender has since been receiving prescription liquid methadone.

A urine sample collected from the offender on December 22, 2015, testedpositive for methamphetamine. Because the defendant denied illicit druguse at the time of collection, the sample was sent to an independentlaboratory and was confirmed positive.

4

"The defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged incriminal activity and shall not associate with any person convicted of afelony, unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer."

On December 22, 2015, a search of the offender's residence was conductedby federal probation officers with the assistance of local law enforcement.The offender was asked if any illegal drugs were in the residence; she statedthere was marijuana under the top bunkbed mattress. Marijuana and drugparaphernalia (a grinder and two one hitter pipes) were found under theoffender's top bunk bed mattress. The offender's boyfriend, BrentHarkless, claimed ownership of the marijuana and paraphernalia. No localcharges were filed.

5

"The defendant shall not incur new credit charges or open additionallines of credit without the approval of the probation officer."

In June 2015, the offender purchased a 2005 Chevy Cavalier and reportedit on her written monthly report. On July 6, 2015, the probation officeradmonished the offender for purchasing the vehicle without permission andreminded her that she was not to incur new credit or open additional linesof credit with the approval of the probation officer.

On July 31, 2015, the offender purchased a 2010 Dodge Caliber andreported it on her written monthly report. She financed $14,999.05 at anannual percentage rate of 21%. If all scheduled payments are made, shewill have paid $25, 142.40. The offender did not seek approval from herprobation officer to incur credit for this vehicle.

7

"The defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged incriminal activity and shall not associate with any person convicted of afelony, unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer."

8

"The defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probationofficer and follow the instructions of the probation officer."

On December 22, 2015, the probation officer instructed the offender not othave any further contact with Brent Harkless, as a result of marijuana andparaphernalia that was found in her apartment on that date. Mr. Harklessadmitted ownership of the items, and the offender admitted knowing theywere in her apartment. On March 31, 2016, the offender and Brent Harklesswere both arrested in Wal-Mart in Franklin, Indiana, for Shoplifing/Theft.

4. The government orally moved to dismiss violation 6 and the Court granted the same.

5. The parties stipulated that:

(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade B violation.

(b) Defendant's criminal history category is II.

(c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised release, therefore, is 4 to 10 months' imprisonment.

6. The parties jointly recommended a sentence of 9 months in the Federal Bureau of Prisons with no supervised release to follow. Defendant requested a recommendation of placement at a FMC Lexington.

The Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and as more fully set forth on the record, finds that the Defendant violated the conditions in the petition, that her supervised release should be revoked, and that she should be sentenced to the custody of the Attorney General or his designee for a period of 9 months with no supervised release to follow. The Defendant is to be taken into custody immediately pending the District Judge's action on this Report and Recommendation. The Court will make a recommendation of placement at FMC Lexington as well as placement in a drug treatment program.

The parties are hereby notified that the District Judge may reconsider any matter assigned to a Magistrate Judge. The parties waived the fourteen-day period to object to the Report and Recommendation.

Dated: 4/26/16

/s/_________

Tim A. Baker

United States Magistrate Judge

Southern District of Indiana Distribution: All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the court's ECF system United States Probation Office, United States Marshal


Summaries of

United States v. Stargell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Apr 26, 2016
Cause No. 1:11-cr-0209-SEB-MJD-1 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 26, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Stargell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERESA STARGELL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 26, 2016

Citations

Cause No. 1:11-cr-0209-SEB-MJD-1 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 26, 2016)