From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stanley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
No. 13-mj-101 DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-mj-101 DAD

05-03-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HENRY STANLEY, Jr., Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692 Acting Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. #177913 Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ Assistant U.S. Attorney


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692
Acting Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. #177913
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER

TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING


Date: May 8, 2013

Judge: Hon. Kendall J. Newman

The parties stipulate and request that the Court continue the preliminary hearing scheduled for May 8, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., to June 6, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., before the duty magistrate.

Counsel for Mr. Stanley requires the time to review discovery with him and to conduct investigation. Counsel also requires the time to continue to discuss pre-indictment resolution of this case with Mr. Stanley, and to continue on-going negotiations with the government.

The parties agree that the above reasons constitute good cause to extend the time for preliminary hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1, and that the Court should extend the time within which the government must file an indictment to June 6, 2013. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Stanley's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Stanley in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

_______________

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.

Assistant Federal Defender

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_______________

MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Finding good cause, the Court orders the preliminary hearing continued to June 6, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., before the duty magistrate; and, time excluded as set forth above for the reasons set forth above. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Stanley's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Stanley in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Stanley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
No. 13-mj-101 DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HENRY STANLEY, Jr., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 3, 2013

Citations

No. 13-mj-101 DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)