From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Standiford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
Jan 28, 2021
No. 2:20-CR-04074-RK-01 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2021)

Opinion

No. 2:20-CR-04074-RK-01

01-28-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID RAY STANDIFORD, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The defendant, by consent, appeared before the undersigned on January 28, 2021, and pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Local Rule 72(c)(1)(j), and 28 U.S.C. § 636, has entered a plea of guilty to the single Count Indictment. After cautioning and examining the defendant, under oath, in accordance with the requirements of Rule 11, it was determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense to which the defendant has plead guilty is supported by a factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offense.

For the proceeding the prosecutor, defense counsel, and judge appeared by video teleconference. The defendant appeared, from the Cole County Jail, by video teleconference. Defense counsel requested, by motion, that this matter be taken up by video teleconference. The defendant expressly waived his right to appear in person and consented to appearing by video teleconference. An offer was made to set up a virtual room for the defendant and his counsel, if requested. The defendant's image and voice were clear, and I confirmed he could see and hear me and the lawyers clearly.

I proceeded without the defendant physically present because, during the national emergency created by the novel coronavirus, he could not be physically present without seriously jeopardizing public health and safety. See the Court's Superseding General Order (implementing Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, H.R. 748 ["CARES Act"], and action by Judicial Conference authorizing video teleconferencing under certain circumstances). I did not postpone the plea because the defendant and his lawyer contended, and I found, delay of the plea would cause serious harm to the interests of justice.

IT IS, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the defendant be adjudged guilty and have a sentence imposed accordingly.

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its filing will bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

/s/

Willie J. Epps, Jr.

United States Magistrate Judge January 28, 2021
Jefferson City, Missouri


Summaries of

United States v. Standiford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
Jan 28, 2021
No. 2:20-CR-04074-RK-01 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Standiford

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID RAY STANDIFORD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2021

Citations

No. 2:20-CR-04074-RK-01 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2021)