From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stace

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 10, 2020
Case No. 20-cr-154 (WMW/TNL) (D. Minn. Dec. 10, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 20-cr-154 (WMW/TNL)

12-10-2020

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert Lawrence Stace, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Robert Lawrence Stace's Motion for Continuance of Motion Hearing (ECF No. 32). Defendant has also filed a Speedy Trial Waiver (ECF No. 33) and a Statement of Facts in Support of Exclusion of Time Under the Speedy Trial Act (ECF No. 34). Defendant requests that the criminal motions hearing scheduled for December 10, 2020, be continued for 45 days, as he and his counsel need additional time to discuss a plea agreement provided by the Government, including the opportunity to speak via videoconference from the facility where he is detained. (ECF Nos. 32, 34.) Defendant requests that this time be excluded from the computation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. (ECF Nos. 32, 34.) The Government has not objected to Defendant's motion.

As previously stated (see ECF No. 29 at 1-2), beginning on March 13, 2020, and continuing thereafter, the Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, has issued a series of General Orders in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, addressing, among other things, criminal proceedings and trials. On November 24, 2020, Chief Judge Tunheim entered General Order No. 22, which continues all in-person hearings, unless the presiding judge determines that an in-person hearing is necessary, through January 31, 2021, and states that no new criminal trial may commence before February 1, 2021. See generally In re: Updated Guidance to Court Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19, Gen. Order No. 22 (D. Minn. Nov. 24, 2020).

All General Orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic may be found on the Court's website at https://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/coronavirus-covid-19-guidance.

General Order No. 22 continues to encourage the use of videoconferencing in criminal proceedings and states that, with the defendant's consent, criminal proceedings will be conducted by videoconferencing, or telephone conferencing if videoconferencing is not reasonably available. General Order No. 22 further provides that, if the defendant declines to consent to proceeding by videoconferencing or telephone conferencing, the matter can be continued until an in-person hearing can be held and time may be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. .

See also General Order No. 19, which went into effect on September 26, 2020, and extends the Court's authorization to conduct certain criminal proceedings via video or telephone conference pursuant to the CARES Act "[b]ecause the emergency created by the COVID-19 outbreak continues to materially affect the functioning of court operations in the District of Minnesota." In re: Updated Guidance to Court Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19, Gen. Order No. 19 (D. Minn. Sept. 25, 2020). --------

The Court inquired whether Defendant consented to conducting the criminal motions hearing using videoconferencing. (ECF Nos. 12, 23.) Defendant indicated through counsel that he consents to videoconferencing for the criminal motions hearing. (ECF No. 26.) Consistent with the health and safety protocols of this Court and the facility in which Defendant is detained, the criminal motions hearing will be held by videoconference and continued to February 4, 2021.

Therefore, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h), this Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial and such continuance is necessary to provide Defendant and his attorney reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and to make efficient use of the parties' resources. Additionally, for the reasons addressed in General Order No. 22 and the well-documented concerns regarding COVID-19, the Court finds that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial. The Court further finds that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), a miscarriage of justice would result if time were not excluded under these unique circumstances.

Based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion for Continuance of Motion Hearing (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED.

2. The period of time from December 2, 2020 through February 4, 2021, shall be excluded from Speedy Trial Act computations in this case.

3. All responses to motions must be filed by January 25, 2021. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(2).

4. Any Notice of Intent to Call Witnesses must be filed by January 25, 2021. D. Minn. LR. 12.1(c)(3)(A).

5. Any Responsive Notice of Intent to Call Witnesses must be filed by January 28, 2021. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(3)(B).
6. The criminal motions hearing is continued to February 4, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. and will occur by ZOOMGOV videoconferencing technology.

7. TRIAL:

a. IF NO PRETRIAL MOTIONS ARE FILED BY DEFENDANT: the following trial and trial-related dates are:

All motions in limine and proposed voir dire and jury instructions are due in District Judge Wilhelmina Wright's chambers at least 21 days before trial begins. Counsel are advised that a pretrial notice will issue that will include additional deadlines.

A status conference must be held on February 9, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. before District Judge Wilhelmina Wright, in Courtroom 7A, Warren E. Burger Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 316 North Robert Street, SAINT PAUL, Minnesota.

This case must commence trial on February 15, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. before District Judge Wright in Courtroom 7A, Warren E. Burger Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 316 North Robert Street, SAINT PAUL, Minnesota.

b. IF PRETRIAL MOTIONS ARE FILED, the trial date, and other related dates, will be rescheduled following the ruling on pretrial motions. Counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Wright to confirm the new trial date.
Dated: December 10, 2020

s/Tony N . Leung

Tony N. Leung

United States Magistrate Judge

District of Minnesota


Summaries of

United States v. Stace

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 10, 2020
Case No. 20-cr-154 (WMW/TNL) (D. Minn. Dec. 10, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Stace

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert Lawrence Stace, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Dec 10, 2020

Citations

Case No. 20-cr-154 (WMW/TNL) (D. Minn. Dec. 10, 2020)