From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Springston

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Oct 16, 2013
534 F. App'x 576 (8th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1624

2013-10-16

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Bobby Lynn Springston Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison


[Unpublished]

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

In 2009, Bobby Lynn Springston was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2250 by failing to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Springston moved to dismiss the indictment arguing that SORNA violated the non-delegation doctrine. The district court denied the motion. Springston appealed. This court affirmed the conviction. United States v. Springston, 650 F.3d 1153, 1157 (8th Cir. 2011). The decision in Reynolds v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 975, 984 (2012) necessitated a remand for consideration of the non-delegation issue. United States v. Springston, 480 Fed. Appx. 860, 861 (8th Cir. 2012). The district court denied the motion to dismiss, upholding SORNA's constitutionality.

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

On appeal, Springston again asserts that 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d) violates the non-delegation doctrine. While this appeal was pending, this court upheld the delegation in 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d) because Congress set forth an intelligible principle guiding the Attorney General's exercise of authority. United States v. Kuehl, 706 F.3d 917, 920 (8th Cir. 2013). See Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 372 (1989) (Congress may delegate legislative authority to another body, provided a legislative act sets an intelligible principle for the exercise of the granted authority to which the authorized body must conform). The Kuehl case resolves Springston's appeal.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Springston

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Oct 16, 2013
534 F. App'x 576 (8th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Springston

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Bobby Lynn Springston…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 16, 2013

Citations

534 F. App'x 576 (8th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Huntley

We also conclude that these conditions are reasonably related to the applicable sentencing factors and…