From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Spigelman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 7, 2021
05-CR-960 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

05-CR-960 (JPO)

12-07-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOEL SPIGELMAN, Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge

On September 27, 2021, Defendant filed a motion requesting appointment of counsel and a sentence reduction under the First Step Act. (Dkt. No. 221.) On December 1, 2021, Defendant again requested appointment of counsel and a sentence reduction on the same grounds. (Dkt. No. 222.) Specifically, Defendant argued that at his trial, the drug quantity was determined by the trial court and not by the jury, as required under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

The Government is directed to file a response to Defendant's filings on or before December 29, 2021.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Spigelman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 7, 2021
05-CR-960 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Spigelman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOEL SPIGELMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

05-CR-960 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2021)