From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Spencer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jul 16, 2013
523 F. App'x 652 (11th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-10077 D.C. Docket No. 3:07-cr-00142-TJC-MCR-1

07-16-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MILTON ALPHONSO SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH]


Non-Argument Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

Before CARNES, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Susan Good Yagzi, appointed counsel for Milton Alphonso Spencer in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Spencer's supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Spencer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jul 16, 2013
523 F. App'x 652 (11th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Spencer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MILTON ALPHONSO SPENCER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 16, 2013

Citations

523 F. App'x 652 (11th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.Com

The parameters of bad faith conduct that might justify an award of fees are not subject to a precise…