United States v. Richardson, 515 F.3d 74, 82 (1st Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. Burgos, 254 F.3d 8, 14 (1st Cir. 2001); United States v. Freeman, 6 F.3d 586, 598 (9th Cir. 1993); Stackpole, 811 F.3d at 693-94; United States v. O'Connell, 703 F.2d 645, 649 (1st Cir. 1983)) (alterations in ordering); United States v. Soto, No. 2:17-cr-00157-JAW, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68406 (D. Me. Apr. 23, 2019).

United States v. Pizarro, 772 F.3d 284, 292 (1st Cir. 2014) (citing Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204, 210 n.3 (2014); Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013); Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)). See also United States v. Soto, No. 2:17-CR-00157-JAW, 2019 WL 1782120, at *6 (D. Me. Apr. 23, 2019). Carr builds her attack against the Indictment on these cases, and reasons that there is no good reason why they should not apply fully in the context of a drug distribution conspiracy charge.