From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sonephady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11 CR 00343 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11 CR 00343 AWI

01-31-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ONG SONEPHADY Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN P. ROONEY Assistant United States Attorney MARK BROUGHTON Attorney for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
KEVIN P. ROONEY
Assistant United States Attorney
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, CA 93721
Telephone: (559) 497-4000
Facsimile: (559) 497-4099
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE TRIAL

DATE AND HEARING RE MOTION TO

SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AND CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Kevin P. Rooney, Counsel for Plaintiff and Mark Broughton Counsel for Defendant that the hearing scheduled for a motion to suppress evidence now scheduled for February 4, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. and trial in the above-captioned matter now set for March 26, 2013, may be vacated and a status conference in this matter be set for February 25, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. before Magistrate McAuliffe to reschedule the trial.

This continuance is at the request of all parties. Counsel have engaged in substantive plea negotiations on the case. However, the parties have been unable to finalize the potential plea agreements. The assigned AUSA has been unavailable for several weeks due to a family emergency. Counsel for the defense has several pending trials which will occupy the counsel for approximately the next two months. The requested continuance is with the intention of conserving time and resources for both parties and the court. The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation, defense investigation, and plea negotiations purposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

______________

KEVIN P. ROONEY

Assistant United States Attorney

______________

MARK BROUGHTON

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Sonephady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11 CR 00343 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Sonephady

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ONG SONEPHADY Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11 CR 00343 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)