From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 3:11cr161 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11cr161

04-10-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHAUN SMITH, Defendant.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO STAY EXECUTION OF SENTENCE PENDING APPEAL (DOC. #29)

The Defendant seeks an order of the Court staying execution of his twenty four month term of imprisonment, pending resolution of his appeal. Said motion is overruled.

In ruling as aforesaid, this Court concludes that the Defendant, while satisfying prong number one of 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b), has totally failed to meet any of the factors required in prong two of that statute.

While this Court is far from above committing legal error, this Court simply sees no viable grounds for appeal, let alone raising "substantial questions of law and fact regarding the reasonableness of his sentence," among other issues. The Defendant entered a plea of guilty. His sentence took into account all of the factors of sentencing required to be considered under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

________________________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Counsel of Record


Summaries of

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 3:11cr161 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHAUN SMITH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11cr161 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)