From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Singer

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Mar 6, 1989
868 F.2d 1201 (10th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

Nos. 88-2619, 88-2624, 88-2625 and 88-2626.

March 6, 1989.

Before MOORE, BALDOCK and EBEL, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

[2] On consideration of the motion and responses of the parties, the en banc opinion of the district court is reversed [ 695 F. Supp. 1140] and these appeals are remanded for resentencing under the Guidelines. Mistretta v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989).

Numbers 88-2516, 88-2433, 88-2435 and 88-2437 are partially remanded for resentencing. Briefing on the merits of the appeals from the judgments of conviction will continue. If defendants are dissatisfied with the sentences under the Guidelines, new notices of appeal will be required. The sentence appeals, if any, will be consolidated with the appeals of the judgments and short supplemental briefs will be allowed.

Certified copies of this order shall stand as and for the mandates of the court.


Summaries of

United States v. Singer

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Mar 6, 1989
868 F.2d 1201 (10th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

United States v. Singer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN TIMOTHY SINGER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 1989

Citations

868 F.2d 1201 (10th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Chavez

Yet, the United States Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit have explicitly found the guidelines to be…