From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Silva-Haro

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 19, 2013
CR.S-12-311-MCE (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

          JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Public Defender, COURTNEY FEIN, Bar #244785 Assistant Federal Defender, Designated Counsel for Service, Attorney for JOSE SILVA-HARO.

          BENJAMIN WAGNER, United States Attorney, SAMUEL WONG, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER; CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, SAMUEL WONG Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and COURTNEY FEIN Assistant Federal Defender for JOSE SILVA-HARO that the status conference hearing date of February 21, 2013 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on May 16, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

         The reason for this continuance is that defense counsel needs additional time to continue to review discovery, investigate defenses, and discuss the case further with Mr. Silva Haro. Communications between Mr. Silva Haro and defense counsel are made more difficult as Mr. Silva Haro is a Spanish language speaker.

         Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this stipulation, February 14, 2013, through and including May 16, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and need for additional time for defense preparation. The parties stipulate and agree that the Court shall find that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         Respectfully submitted,

          ORDER

         UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the February 21, 2013, status conference hearing be continued to May 16, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time beginning from the parties stipulation on February 14, 2013, up to and including the May 16, 2013 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, for continuity of counsel and to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Silva-Haro

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 19, 2013
CR.S-12-311-MCE (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Silva-Haro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE SILVA-HARO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

CR.S-12-311-MCE (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)