From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Short

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Apr 24, 2020
CRIM. CASE NO. 3:15-CR-0174 (JCH) (D. Conn. Apr. 24, 2020)

Summary

denying a continuance but ordering defendant back to a BOP-designated facility where he could enter training programs not available at pretrial detention facilities

Summary of this case from United States v. Boatwright

Opinion

CRIM. CASE NO. 3:15-CR-0174 (JCH)

04-24-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ROBERT SHORT, Defendant.


RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RESCIND ORDER (DOC. NO. 538)

Defendant Robert Short ("Short") moves this court to rescind its Order, dated April 9, 2020, to return him to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"). See Motion to Rescind Order ("Mot.") (Doc. No. 538). For the reasons that follow, Short's Motion is denied.

On March 21, 2017, Short pled guilty to Count Twenty-Four of the Indictment charging him with causing the death of another through the use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of section 924(j)(1) of title 18 of the United States Code. See Plea Agreement (Doc. No. 301). On October 4, 2017, the court sentenced Short to a sentence of 30 years' imprisonment. See Judgment (Doc. No. 373). The court also imposed five years' supervised release, and several Special Conditions of Supervised Release. See id.

On December 23, 2019, the Second Circuit vacated four of these Special Conditions, and remanded the case to this court for resentencing. See Mandate (Doc. No. 513). This court then issued a writ to bring Short to this District for resentencing. See Notice (Doc. No. 515). Short was subsequently transferred to the Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility ("Wyatt") to await resentencing in accordance with the Circuit's Mandate on April 7, 2020. See Notice (Doc. No. 531). Following the outbreak of COVID-19, and the General Orders of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, dated March 24, 2020, Short moved to continue resentencing until he could physically appear in court. See Objection (Doc. No. 535).

On April 9, 2020, the court granted Short's Motion and entered the following Order:

The defendant was transferred from his designated BOP facility to Wyatt Detention Center in order to appear for resentencing pursuant to a Mandate of the Court of Appeals (Doc. No. 513). In accordance with the General Orders of the District of Connecticut, re: COVID-19 virus, the court does not foresee the commencement of in court proceedings for many months, likely well into the fall. Further, the court notes that defendant is serving a 30 year sentence, and the remand relates solely to terms of conditions of supervised release.

Therefore, the court orders the Bureau of Prisons to redesignate or return the defendant to his initial BOP facility until such time that the court deems it safe to hold the resentencing hearing and, at that time, will order that the defendant be transported back to Connecticut.
Order (Doc. No. 536). Following this Order, Short refused to board the bus that would return him to a BOP facility. In the instant Motion, Short opposes this Order.

The court understands that one bus leaves Wyatt each week to transfer inmates to a holding facility for a quarantine period of 14 days. Short would then be transported from this facility to his BOP-designated facility.

The court denies Short's Motion. As a preliminary matter, the court finds the arguments Short presents in support of his Motion to be unavailing. Short requests this relief "because of his fear of contracting the COVID-19 while in transportation to [his BOP-designated facility]." Mot. at 1. Short asserts that he suffers from asthma, and argues that "this unique medical condition makes him susceptible to contracting this fatal disease while being transported." Id. at 2. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, people with "moderate to severe" asthma may be at increased risk of getting very sick from COVID-19. The severity of Short's asthma is unclear. There is nothing before the court to support his claim. Indeed, the Presentence Report (dated June 26, 2017) notes that Short previously experienced occasional migraines and that "currently he has no medical issues and he is not prescribed any medication." See Presentence Report ("PSR") (Doc. No. 319), ¶ 76. Short is a 33-year-old man and, with the exception of his passing reference to asthma, appears to be in excellent health. The court concludes that Short does not present compelling circumstances warranting the relief he seeks.

The seriousness of asthma as a risk factor is unclear. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as of April 2, has advised that people with "moderate to severe" asthma may be at increased risk of getting very sick from COVID-19. See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/asthma.html (last accessed Apr. 23, 2020). More recent data suggests that, despite such warnings, asthma is underrepresented in the comorbidities reported for patients with COVID-19. See Danny Hakim, Asthma Is Absent Among Top Covid-19 Risk Factors, Early Data Shows, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 16, 2020, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/16/health/coronavirus-asthma-risk.html (last accessed Apr. 23, 2020).

Furthermore, granting Short's Motion would result in Short's presence at Wyatt for a significant period of time—at least six months, and likely much more. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the General Orders of the District of Connecticut, few sentencings are proceeding at this time. The court already has on its docket more than 40 criminal defendants awaiting sentencing. These sentencings are ones that must be conducted in person, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(a), as there are no compelling reasons to conduct them over videoconference, see General Order re CARES Act Authorization (Mar. 29, 2020) (allowing felony sentencings to proceed where a judge determines that further delay "would cause serious harm to the interests of justice").

This figure does not include the many more defendants awaiting changes of plea, trial, or other pretrial proceedings. The court has 23 defendants awaiting trial. --------

Short is currently held at Wyatt awaiting resentencing on four of his special conditions of supervised release. See Mandate (Doc. No. 513). He is serving a 360-month prison sentence, with an estimated date of discharge of May 25, 2043. In light of this, the undersigned views Short's resentencing as among the lowest priority when compared to the scores of sentencings pending on the docket and awaiting scheduling. Further, Short will suffer no prejudice if this resentencing does not take place until 2021, or even 2030; the resentencing affects only his conditions of supervised release, which will commence in the 2040's. Granting Short's Motion would therefore likely result in Short's presence at Wyatt for a significant period of time, and denying his Motion will not prejudice him. Therefore, the court determines that Short should be returned to his BOP-designed facility, where he can avail himself of the facility's various programs that Wyatt—a facility for pretrial detainees—largely lacks.

As noted above, the court has already issued an Order directing Short to be returned to his BOP-designed facility (Doc. No. 536), and, according to the United States Marshals, Short has refused to comply. The United States Marshals have requested an Order directing Short to get into the transport, and, upon Short's failure to comply, to use reasonable force to carry out this court's Order. In light of this court's denial of the instant Motion, a separate Order to this effect will enter.

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 24th day of April 2020 at New Haven, Connecticut.

/s/ Janet C. Hall

Janet C. Hall

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Short

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Apr 24, 2020
CRIM. CASE NO. 3:15-CR-0174 (JCH) (D. Conn. Apr. 24, 2020)

denying a continuance but ordering defendant back to a BOP-designated facility where he could enter training programs not available at pretrial detention facilities

Summary of this case from United States v. Boatwright
Case details for

United States v. Short

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ROBERT SHORT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Apr 24, 2020

Citations

CRIM. CASE NO. 3:15-CR-0174 (JCH) (D. Conn. Apr. 24, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Taura

Since the enactment of the CARES Act, most district courts have found that serious harm to the interests of…

United States v. Powell-Ryder

Since the enactment of the CARES Act, most district courts have found that serious harm to the interests of…