From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sherifi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 13, 2012
7:12-CR-20-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 13, 2012)

Opinion

7:12-CR-20-BR

06-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HYSEN SHERIFI, SHKUMBIN SHERIFI, and NEVINE ALY ELSHIEKH, Defendants.


ORDER

This case comes before the court for the entry of a pretrial scheduling order. Based on the parties' joint proposed pretrial schedule (D.E. 131, pp. 3-5), other dates discussed or adopted at the 29 May 2012 status conference, and the court's own adjustments, the court hereby ADOPTS the pretrial schedule in the table appended hereto.

_________________________

James E. Gates

United States Magistrate Judge

Pretrial Schedule

U.S. v. Sherifi, et al., No. 7:12-CR-20-BR

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Deadline ¦Days to Trial ¦Weeks to Trial ¦ +---------------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦Motions to Compel Discovery¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1 ¦under Rule 16 and ¦7/23/12 ¦103 ¦15 ¦ ¦ ¦Brady Material ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦2 ¦Defense Motions for ¦7/23/12 ¦103 ¦15 ¦ ¦ ¦Severance ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦3 ¦Defense Motions to Dismiss ¦7/23/12 ¦103 ¦15 ¦ ¦ ¦for Defect in Indictment ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ 4 ¦Defense Motions for Change ¦7/23/12 ¦103 ¦15 ¦ ¦ ¦of Venue ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦Reciprocal Discovery by ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ 5 ¦Defendants per Rule 16(b) ¦7/30/12 ¦96 ¦14 ¦ ¦ ¦(1)(A) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦6 ¦Motions to Suppress ¦7/30/12 ¦96 ¦14 ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦Gov't Production of Reports¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦7 ¦and Examinations per Rule ¦8/20/12 ¦76 ¦11 ¦ ¦ ¦16(a)(1)(F) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦Gov't Production of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦8 ¦Summaries of Expert ¦8/20/12 ¦76 ¦11 ¦ ¦ ¦Testimony per Rule 16(a)(1)¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦(G) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦Defense Production of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦9 ¦Reports and Examinations ¦8/27/12 ¦69 ¦10 ¦ ¦ ¦per Rule 16(b)(1)(B) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦Defense Production of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦10 ¦Summaries of Expert ¦8/27/12 ¦69 ¦10 ¦ ¦ ¦Testimony per Rule 16(b)(1)¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦(C) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦Defense Notice re Evidence ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦11 ¦of Mental Condition per ¦8/27/12 ¦69 ¦10 ¦ ¦ ¦Rule 12.2 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦12 ¦Gov't and Defense Expert ¦9/17/12 ¦49 ¦7 ¦ ¦ ¦Rebuttal Reports ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦13 ¦Gov't Notice of Intent to ¦9/17/12 ¦49 ¦7 ¦ ¦ ¦Use 404(b) Evidence ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦All Remaining Pretrial ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦14 ¦Motions (e.g. , Motions ¦10/1/12 ¦35 ¦5 ¦ ¦ ¦in Limine) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦15 ¦Gov't Production of Jencks ¦10/22/12 ¦14 ¦2 ¦ ¦ ¦Material ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦16 ¦Gov't Production of ¦10/22/12 ¦14 ¦2 ¦ ¦ ¦Giglio Material ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦17 ¦Proposed Voir Dire and Jury¦10/29/12 ¦7 ¦1 ¦ ¦ ¦Instructions ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----+---------------------------+----------+---------------+----------------¦ ¦18 ¦Arraignment /Trial ¦11/5/12 ¦0 ¦0 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

The deadline for responses to all motions is 21 days from the service of the motion, pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 47.1(c), E.D.N.C.


Summaries of

United States v. Sherifi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 13, 2012
7:12-CR-20-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Sherifi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HYSEN SHERIFI, SHKUMBIN SHERIFI, and NEVINE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 13, 2012

Citations

7:12-CR-20-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 13, 2012)