From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sewell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
No. 2:05-cr-0554 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cr-0554 LKK EFB P

02-19-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. HARVEY SEWELL, Movant.


ORDER

Movant, a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On November 19, 2012, the undersigned issued an order confirming that a response to the amended § 2255 motion was due January 16, 2013. Dckt. No. 269. However, respondent failed to timely file a response to movant's amended motion. Therefore, on January 28, 2013, the undersigned ordered respondent's counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to file a responsive pleading. Dckt. No. 270.

On February 11, 2013, respondent's counsel filed a response to the order to show cause. Dckt. No. 272. Therein, respondent's counsel takes full responsibility for the failure, apologizes to the court, and indicates that the failure to timely file a response was due to a calendaring error. Id. Respondent's counsel also assures the court that he will implemented corrective measures to ensure that similar calendaring errors do not occur in the future. Id. In light of those representations, the January 28, 2013 order to show cause is discharged. No sanctions will be imposed.

SO ORDERED.

_______________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Sewell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
No. 2:05-cr-0554 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Sewell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. HARVEY SEWELL, Movant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

No. 2:05-cr-0554 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)