From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Schaefer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
No. 2:12-CR-00053 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-CR-00053 MCE

03-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SCHAEFER, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Defender DOUGLAS BEEVERS, USVI Bar #766 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant ROBERT SCHAEFER BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Matthew Morris Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
DOUGLAS BEEVERS, USVI Bar #766
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
ROBERT SCHAEFER

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE


Date: April 11, 2013

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, MATTHEW MORRIS, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the plaintiff, and DOUGLAS BEEVERS, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant ROBERT SCHAEFER, that the status conference set for March 7, 2013 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on April 11, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The reason for the continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review and examine the forensic evidence. Specifically, defense counsel has recently retained a forensic expert and has submitted a proposed protective order to permit the expert's assistance in review of the contraband. The parties stipulate and agree that the time period between the signing of this order through and including April 11, 2013 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A)and(B)(iv)and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

______________________

DOUGLAS BEEVERS

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

ROBERT SCHAEFER

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

______________________

Matthew Morris

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the signing of this order through and including April 11, 2013 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4.

A new status conference date is hereby set for April 11, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Schaefer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
No. 2:12-CR-00053 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Schaefer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SCHAEFER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-CR-00053 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)