From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Scanlan

United States District Court, Southern District of Iowa
Nov 4, 2021
4:21-cr-00110-JEG-HCA (S.D. Iowa Nov. 4, 2021)

Opinion

4:21-cr-00110-JEG-HCA

11-04-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SCOTT SCANLAN, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY (PLEA AGREEMENT)

ROSS A. WALTERS, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States of America and the defendant, having both filed a written consent to conduct of the plea proceedings by a magistrate judge, appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and LCrR 11. The defendant entered a plea of guilty to Counts 2 and 3 of the Superseding Indictment which charged him with production of pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251 (a) and (e), and to Count 6 of the Superseding Indictment which charged him with offense by a registered sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2260A. Defendant also agreed to forfeiture of a black LG VS996 cellular telephone containing an Adata 64gb microSDcard within. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects addressed in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty pleas were in their entirety voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently made and did not result from force, threats, or promises. I further determined that there is a factual basis for the guilty pleas on each of the essential elements of the offenses in question. A plea agreement was disclosed at the plea proceeding and defendant stated he understood its terms and agreed to be bound by them. To the extent the plea agreement is of the type specified in Rule 11(c)(1)(A) or (C) defendant was advised the district judge to whom the case is assigned may accept the plea agreement, reject it, or defer a decision whether to accept or reject it until the judge has reviewed the presentence report as provided by Rule 11(c)(3)(A). To the extent the plea agreement is of the type specified in Rule 11(c)(1)(B) defendant was advised by the Court that defendant has no right to withdraw the plea if the Court does not follow a recommendation or request in question.

I recommend that the pleas of guilty be accepted and that the defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly. A presentence report will be ordered and sentencing proceedings scheduled.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Scanlan

United States District Court, Southern District of Iowa
Nov 4, 2021
4:21-cr-00110-JEG-HCA (S.D. Iowa Nov. 4, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Scanlan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SCOTT SCANLAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Iowa

Date published: Nov 4, 2021

Citations

4:21-cr-00110-JEG-HCA (S.D. Iowa Nov. 4, 2021)