From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Dec 14, 2016
CRIMINAL NO. 2:16-CR-957-1 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2016)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 2:16-CR-957-1

12-14-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARC ANTHONY SANDOVAL


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL

A detention hearing has been held in accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). The following requires detention of the Defendant pending trial in this case:

(1) There is probable cause to believe the Defendant committed an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B); and

(2) The Defendant has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the Defendant as required and the safety of the community.

The evidence against the Defendant meets the probable cause standard. The findings and conclusions contained in the Pretrial Services Report are adopted as the court's own, supplemented by the testimony of his mother, Belinda Lilinquin and the proffer of defense counsel. The Defendant was placed on misdemeanor probation on May 5, 2016, and according to his probation officer, he has not reported and he tested positive for marihuana. The only evidence before the court is that the Defendant is either unwilling or unable to comply with court-ordered conditions of release. He is a poor bond risk.

The Defendant is committed to the custody of the United States Marshal or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The Defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the Defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

ORDERED this 14th day of December, 2016.

/s/_________

B. JANICE ELLINGTON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Dec 14, 2016
CRIMINAL NO. 2:16-CR-957-1 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Sandoval

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARC ANTHONY SANDOVAL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 2:16-CR-957-1 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2016)