From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Samuels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 1, 2015
14-CR-89-A (W.D.N.Y. May. 1, 2015)

Opinion

14-CR-89-A

05-01-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. STACY SAMUELS, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for pretrial proceedings. The defendant, Stacy Samuels, filed a motion to suppress electronically-intercepted communications. (Dkt. No. 28). The United States responded on September 11, 2014, and also moved for reciprocal discovery. (Dkt. No. 34). Oral argument was held on September 26, 2014. Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 36) on October 4, 2014 recommending that defendant Samuels' motion to suppress be denied, and that the United States' cross motion be granted. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, defendant Samuels' motion to suppress is denied, and the United States' cross motion for reciprocal discovery is granted. The case remains before the Magistrate Judge completion of pretrial motion practice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: May 1, 2015


Summaries of

United States v. Samuels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 1, 2015
14-CR-89-A (W.D.N.Y. May. 1, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Samuels

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. STACY SAMUELS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 1, 2015

Citations

14-CR-89-A (W.D.N.Y. May. 1, 2015)