From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Salyer

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 1, 2013
CR. S-10-061 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER, Defendant. No. CR. S-10-061 LKK United States District Court, E.D. California. April 1, 2013

          ORDER

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

         The court is in receipt of the March 29, 2013 Order from the Ninth Circuit granting mandamus, and ordering this court to (1) vacate its March 14, 2013 judgment "with respect to restitution, " and (2) determine the restitution motion without regard to defendant Salyer's "claimed financial status and the potential availability of civil remedies."

         Although this court strongly disagrees, it is of course bound by the order of the Ninth Circuit. Accordingly,

         1. The March 14, 2013 Amended Judgment (ECF No. 569), is VACATED with respect to restitution only; and

         2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3), the request for restitution by Morningstar Packing Company (see ECF No. 555), is hereby REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd (chosen pursuant to random selection), for consideration of the matter and the submission back to this court of Findings and Recommendations.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Salyer

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 1, 2013
CR. S-10-061 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Salyer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 1, 2013

Citations

CR. S-10-061 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)