Opinion
22-3655
09-07-2023
United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Freddy Ciro Salinas, also known as Freddie Cero Salinas Defendant-Appellant
Unpublished
Submitted: September 1, 2023
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Freddy Salinas appeals after he pleaded guilty to a firearms offense, and the district court sentenced him to 71 months in prison, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the district court erred in calculating the Guidelines imprisonment range.
The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Having reviewed the record, we conclude any error in calculating Salinas's Guidelines range was harmless. See United States v. Wardlow, 830 F.3d 817, 822 (8th Cir. 2016) (explaining the standard of review). The district court adequately explained why the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors justified the sentence, and concluded it would have imposed the same sentence regardless of how it resolved Salinas's challenge to the calculation of the Guidelines range. See United States v. Hamilton, 929 F.3d 943, 948 (8th Cir. 2019) (concluding any Guidelines miscalculation was harmless when the district court stated it imposed the sentence based on the § 3553(a) factors, "regardless of the calculation of the sentencing guidelines"). Finally, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.