From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Saed

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 7, 2024
24-mj-70178-MAG-1 (JST) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2024)

Opinion

24-mj-70178-MAG-1 (JST)

03-07-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DIEGO SAED, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

RE: ECF NO. 23

JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Defendant's motion to reconsider the Court's prior order staying the defendant's release is denied. The motion repeats the arguments the Defendant made in his opposition to the Government's motion for stay, ECF No. 19, and the Court has already carefully considered those arguments. “A motion for reconsideration is not an avenue to re-litigate the same issues and arguments upon which the court already has ruled.” Brown v. Kinross Gold, U.S.A., 378 F.Supp.2d 1280, 1288 (D. Nev. 2005).

The motion for an expedited briefing schedule is also denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Saed

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 7, 2024
24-mj-70178-MAG-1 (JST) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Saed

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DIEGO SAED, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 7, 2024

Citations

24-mj-70178-MAG-1 (JST) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2024)