From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2015
Case No. 3:10-cr-13 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cr-13 Case No. 3:13-cr-179 Case No. 3:15-cv-356

11-03-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MARK RUTLEDGE, Defendant/Petitioner.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #98 IN CASE NO. 3:10-cr-13, DOC. #42 IN CASE NO. 3:13-cr-179); DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE MOTION TO CORRECT ILLEGAL SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(4) (DOC. #97 IN CASE NO. 3:10-cr-13, DOC. #41 IN CASE NO. 3:13-cr-179); DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT AND AGAINST PETITIONER; TERMINATION ENTRY

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, in his October 7, 2015, Report and Recommendations (Doc. #98 in Case No. 3:10-cr-13 and Doc. #42 in Case No. 3:13-cr-179), as well as on a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety. Although the parties were notified of their right to file Objections to the Report and Recommendations, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no Objections have been filed within the time allotted.

Petitioner's Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(4) (Doc. #97 in Case No. 3:10-cr-13 and Doc. #42 in Case No. 3:13-cr-179) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Given that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, further, that the Court's decision herein would not be debatable among reasonable jurists, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Given that any appeal from this Court's decision would be objectively frivolous, Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Judgment will be entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner.

The captioned cases are hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. Date: November 3, 2015

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2015
Case No. 3:10-cr-13 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Rutledge

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MARK RUTLEDGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cr-13 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2015)