From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 22, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cr-80 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cr-80

07-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. JAVOUGHN K. RUTLEDGE, Defendant(s),


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 59, and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(b)(2) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Plea Agreement herein and Defendant's plea of guilty pursuant to that agreement are accepted.

_______________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 22, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cr-80 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rutledge

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. JAVOUGHN K. RUTLEDGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jul 22, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cr-80 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 22, 2013)