From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ruiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. CR. S-12-257-TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR. S-12-257-TLN

05-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PEDRO RUIZ, Defendant.

DENNIS S. WARS Attorney for Defendant PEDRO RUIZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Dennis S. Waks for TODD D. LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney


DENNIS S. WARS, Bar #142581
Attorney at Law
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 350
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-9871
Attorney for Defendant
PEDRO RUIZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER


Date: June 13, 2013

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, TODD D. LERAS, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and DENNIS S. WARS, attorney for defendant, that the current Status Conference date of May 9, 2013, be vacated and rescheduled for June 13, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.

Defense counsel needs additional time to prepare, to review the discovery, and to interview witnesses. Counsel is also awaiting a final plea agreement and will need additional time to review the agreement and go over it with Mr. Ruiz, who lives out of the area.

It is further stipulated and agreed to between the parties that the period from the date of this order to June 13, 2013, should be excluded in computing the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. All parties stipulate and agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)(Reasonable time to prepare) and [Local Code T4].

The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

____________

DENNIS S. WARS

Attorney for Defendant

PEDRO RUIZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Dennis S. Waks for

TODD D. LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

For Good cause appearing:

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is continued to June 13, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from May 9, 2013, up to and including June 13, 2013, is excluded pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)(Reasonable time to prepare) and [Local Code T4]; and,

THE COURT FINDS that the ends of justice served by granting the defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

____________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Ruiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. CR. S-12-257-TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ruiz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PEDRO RUIZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. CR. S-12-257-TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)