From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rotteveel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 18, 2013
2:11-CR-00447 WBS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, JEAN M. HOBLER, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America.

          THOMAS JOHNSON, Attorney for Defendant HUBERT ROTTEVEEL.


          STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND HEARING ON MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS AND DISMISS

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         The defendant's motion to suppress and motion to dismiss are currently set for non-evidentiary hearing on December 23, 2013, with briefing from both parties on the motion to suppress due on December 16, 2013. The parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. An additional week for briefing of the motion to suppress is necessary and appropriate.

2. As a result of additional time for the briefing on the motion to suppress, the hearing on the motions to dismiss and to suppress should be continued to December 30, 2013, a date confirmed available by the Courtroom Deputy.

         The parties therefore request the Court execute the attached proposed order, continuing the hearing on both motions to December 30, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.

          ORDER

         The due date for the briefing on defendant's motion to suppress is continued to December 23, 2013, and the hearing on the defendant's motions to suppress and to dismiss, currently set for December 23, 2013, is continued to December 30, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rotteveel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 18, 2013
2:11-CR-00447 WBS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rotteveel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HUBERT ROTTEVEEL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 18, 2013

Citations

2:11-CR-00447 WBS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)