From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rosenthall

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Oct 12, 2023
Civil Action 4:23-CV-177-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:23-CV-177-DMB-JMV

10-12-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. MARY ROSENTHALL DEFENDANT

CLAY JOYNER United States Attorney SAMUEL D. WRIGHT (MSB#101425) Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America MARY ROSENTHALL, Pro Se Defendant


CLAY JOYNER United States Attorney SAMUEL D. WRIGHT (MSB#101425) Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America

MARY ROSENTHALL, Pro Se Defendant

CONSENT JUDGMENT

DEBRA M. BROWN CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This consent judgment is entered into between the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and on behalf of the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) (collectively the “United States”), and Defendant Mary Rosenthall. The parties stipulate and consent to the entry of judgment in favor of the United States of America against Defendant Mary Rosenthall on the basis of violations of the False Claims Act, U.S.C. §3729-3733, in the sum of $23,103.98, which sum specifically includes $20,603.98 (the amount of the loan (# 9507408700), plus interest through the date of forgiveness) for the Paycheck Protection Program loan and $2,500.00 for the bank's processing fees. Post judgment interest shall accrue at the legal rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) and shall be computed daily and compounded annually until paid in full, but without costs to either party. Defendant Mary Rosenthall agrees that the sum owed, $23,103.98, plus interest, is due and payable in full immediately. Defendant also agrees to pay a separate $402.00 filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2).

Provided, however, execution shall not issue upon this judgment as long as Defendant Mary Rosenthall pays to the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney, 900 Jefferson Avenue, Oxford, Mississippi 38655, an agreed upon minimum monthly payment each and every month until this judgment is satisfied. The amount of this payment shall be subject to review and modification not less than annually. This debt shall also be included in the Treasury Offset Program so that any federal monies owed to Defendant Mary Rosenthall will be credited to her outstanding debt.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

United States v. Rosenthall

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Oct 12, 2023
Civil Action 4:23-CV-177-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Oct. 12, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Rosenthall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. MARY ROSENTHALL DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:23-CV-177-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Oct. 12, 2023)