From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Romo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Feb 7, 2013
Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB

02-07-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ROMO, Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C. JOSEPH J. WISEMAN Attorney for Defendant David Romo BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL D. ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for the United States


JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403
WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106

Davis, California 95618

Telephone: 530.759.0700

Facsimile: 530.759.0800
Attorney for Defendant
DAVID ROMO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through undersigned counsel, Michael D. Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, and Joseph J. Wiseman, attorney for defendant DAVID ROMO, without objection from the United States Probation Officer assigned to this case, that the sentencing of Defendant now scheduled for March 1, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., be rescheduled to, April 19, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

Pursuant to this stipulation, the Proposed Presentence Report shall be disclosed to Counsel no later than March 8, 2013, Defendant's Written Objections shall be due March 22, 2013, Pre-Sentence Report shall be filed with the Court March 29, 2013, Defendant's Motion to Correct the Presentence Report shall be due on April 5, 2013, and Plaintiff's Opposition/Reply to said motion shall be due on April 12, 2013.

The parties are requesting this continuance to allow counsel additional time to provide probation with information relating to the loss calculation. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

By: ____________________________

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN

Attorney for Defendant

David Romo

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: Joseph J. Wiseman

For: Michael D. Anderson

MICHAEL D. ANDERSON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for the United States

PROPOSED ORDER

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the sentencing in the above-captioned case be continued to APRIL 19, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. and the other dates adjust as noted by stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Romo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Feb 7, 2013
Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Romo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ROMO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2013)