From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Romanyuk

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Mar 28, 2023
3:22-cr-110 (VAB) (D. Conn. Mar. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cr-110 (VAB)

03-28-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STANISLAV ROMANYUK and VADIMS ANANICS


ORDER

Victor A. Bolden United States District Judge

The United States of America, having applied for the appointment a Classified Information Security Officer and alternates pursuant to the Classified Information Procedures Act, 18 U.S.C. App. III (“CIPA”) and Section 2 of the Security Procedures established by the Chief Justice of the United States and promulgated pursuant to Section 9 of CIPA, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the application is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED, in accordance with Section 9 of CIPA and the Security Procedures promulgated under Section 9, that the Court designates Harry J. Rucker as the Classified Information Security Officer in this case. It is further ORDERED that the Court designates the following persons as Alternate Classified Information Security Officers, to serve in the event Mr. Rucker is unavailable: Daniel O. Hartenstine, Winfield S. Slade, Daniella M. Medel, Matthew W. Mullery, and Connor B. Morse.

It is further ORDERED that the designated Classified Information Security Officer and alternates shall perform the functions and carry out the duties and responsibilities prescribed in the Security Procedures promulgated under Section 9 of CIPA.


Summaries of

United States v. Romanyuk

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Mar 28, 2023
3:22-cr-110 (VAB) (D. Conn. Mar. 28, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Romanyuk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STANISLAV ROMANYUK and VADIMS ANANICS

Court:United States District Court, D. Connecticut

Date published: Mar 28, 2023

Citations

3:22-cr-110 (VAB) (D. Conn. Mar. 28, 2023)