From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Sep 10, 2019
CASE NO. 2:08-CR-00227 (W.D. La. Sep. 10, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:08-CR-00227

09-10-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GEORGE L. ROMAN III (01)


JUDGE JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

MAG. JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 83] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, with the undersigned having determined that the findings are correct under the applicable law and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation filed in the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the instant § 2255 Motion [doc. 79] be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the Motions for Evidentiary Hearing and Court-Appointed Counsel [doc. 80] be DENIED.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. After considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2253, the court denies a certificate of appealability because the movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

THUS DONE in Chambers on this 10 day of September, 2019.

/s/ _________

JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Roman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Sep 10, 2019
CASE NO. 2:08-CR-00227 (W.D. La. Sep. 10, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Roman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GEORGE L. ROMAN III (01)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Sep 10, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 2:08-CR-00227 (W.D. La. Sep. 10, 2019)