We draw the following facts from the portions of the presentence report to which neither party objected. See United States v. Rogers, 17 F.4th 229, 232 (1st Cir. 2021) (citing United States v. Benoit, 975 F.3d 20, 21 (1st Cir. 2020) ). A confidential informant told the Puerto Rico Police Department ("PRPD") on May 3, 2018, that a probationer was illegally armed.

We draw the following facts from the portions of the presentence report to which neither party objected. See United States v. Rogers, 17 F.4th 229, 232 (1st Cir. 2021) (citing United States v. Benoit, 975 F.3d 20, 21 (1st Cir. 2020)). A confidential informant told the Puerto Rico Police Department ("PRPD") on May 3, 2018, that a probationer was illegally armed.

"[I]n applying a four-level offense enhancement, under the Sentencing Guidelines, for use or possession of a firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony" under section 2K2.1(b)(6)(B), "[e]ither direct or circumstantial evidence will do, with the sentencing court free to draw common[-]sense inferences from the evidence." United States v. Rogers, 17 F.4th 229, 234 (1st Cir. 2021); see also United States v. Whitaker, 633 Fed.Appx. 104, 105 (4th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Garcia, 635 F.3d 472, 478 (10th Cir.2011) (explaining that a court may rely on common-sense inferences drawn from circumstantial evidence when determining applicability of § 2K2.1(b)(5) enhancement); United States v. Manigan, 592 F.3d 621, 629 (4th Cir. 2010) (government may rely on circumstantial evidence to meet its burden regarding the imposition of a sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 1D1.1(b)(1)); United States v. Newhoff, 627 F.3d 1163, 1170 (9th Cir. 2010) (upholding a § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement based on reasonable inferences drawn from circumstantial evidence).