From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 12 - CR - 0117 - GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12 - CR - 0117 - GEB

01-08-2013

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Benjamin Gonzales Rodriquez, Defendant

JAN DAVID KAROWSKY Attorney at Law A Professional Corporation Attorney for Defendant Benjamin Gonzales Rodriquez


JAN DAVID KAROWSKY
Attorney at Law
A Professional Corporation
Attorney for Defendant
Benjamin Gonzales Rodriquez

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE


DATE: January 11, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.


ORDER

The status conference is continued to March 29, 2013. For the reasons recited in the filed stipulation, the Court adopts the stipulations of the parties; adopts the proposed disclosure schedule and finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance and the stipulations of the parties outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through March 29, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 12 - CR - 0117 - GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriquez

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Benjamin Gonzales Rodriquez…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

No. 12 - CR - 0117 - GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)