Opinion
No. 11-10081 D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01329-GMS-1
02-29-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROSENDO RODRIGUEZ-ZETINA, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Rosendo Rodriguez-Zetina appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for being found in the United States after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-Zetina's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.