From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriguez-Payan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2012
Case Number: 11CR3310-BTM (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 11CR3310-BTM

07-16-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARTURO RODRIGUEZ-PAYAN [1]

PAUL A. BARR, FEDERAL DEFENDERS, INC. Defendant's Attorney


JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

(For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)

(For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)


PAUL A. BARR, FEDERAL DEFENDERS, INC.

Defendant's Attorney

REGISTRATION No. 26903298

[]

THE DEFENDANT:

[x] admitted guilt to violation of allegation(s) No. 1

[] was found in violation of allegation(s) No. _______________ after denial of guilt.

ACCORDINGLY, the court has adjudicated that the defendant is guilty of the following allegation(s):

+---------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Allegation Number ¦Nature of Violation ¦ +-------------------+-------------------------------------------¦ ¦1 ¦Committed a federal, state or local offense¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------+

Supervised Release is revoked and the defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. This sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify the court and United States Attorney or any material change in the defendant's economic circumstances.

JULY 13, 2012

Date of Imposition of Sentence

_______________

HON. BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of SIXTY (60) DAYS CONSECUTIVE TO THE SENTENCE IMPOSED IN USDC-D/AZ CASE 12MJ12185-001-DTF

[] The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:

[] The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

[] The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

[] at _______________ [] a.m. [] p.m. on _______________.
as notified by the United States Marshal.

[] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons:

[] before _______________
[] as notified by the United States Marshal.
[] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on _______________ to _______________ at _______________, with a certified copy of this judgment.

_______________

UNITED STATES MARSHAL

By ______________

DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

_______________

BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriguez-Payan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2012
Case Number: 11CR3310-BTM (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriguez-Payan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARTURO RODRIGUEZ-PAYAN [1]

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 11CR3310-BTM (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)