From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
3:17-cr-01318-BEN (S.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

3:17-cr-01318-BEN

07-15-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NOEL VICENTE RODRIGUEZ, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE [ECF No. 38]

Hon. Roger T, Benitez, United States District Judge

Pro se, Movant Noel Vicente Rodriguez filed a Motion for Compassionate Release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) ("Section 3582(c)(1)(A)"). ECF No, 38. The Motion was referred to Federal Defenders pursuant to General Order 692-B. ECF No. 39. On June 2, 2021, Federal Defenders filed a Status Report and did not request appointment on Movant's behalf. See ECF No. 41. On June 22, 2021, the United States filed an Opposition to Movant's request for compassionate release. ECF No. 44.

At this time, the Court recognizes there is no applicable policy statement governing compassionate release motions filed by defendants under the recent amendments to Section 3582(c)(1)(A). The Court also recognizes that a district court's discretion may be informed by U.S.S.G. § IB 1.13, but that it is not binding, and a district court may consider any extraordinary and compelling reason for release that a defendant might raise. United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 801-02 (9th Cir. 2021).

In support of his request for compassionate release, Movant argues his back pain constitutes an extraordinary and compelling reason for his release. Mot., ECF No. 60, 4-5. While his pain may be severe, other courts within this district have found similar "[c]hronic conditions . . . that can be managed in prison are not a sufficient basis for compassionate release." United States v. Porno, No. 17-cr-04360-WQH, 2020 WL 7342659, at *4 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2020). Moreover, Movant has been offered a COVID-19 vaccine, which he refused. Opp'n, ECF No. 44, 4. Accordingly, the risk of contracting COVID-19 does not constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason for his release.

Because Movant has not demonstrated extraordinary and compelling reasons justifying his release, the Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER TO ANSWER

Movant Roberto Sotelo has filed a Motion for Compassionate Release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) ("Section 3582(c)(1)(A)"). ECF No. 693. Pursuant to General Order 692-B, the Motion was referred to Federal Defenders for a status report. ECF No. 694. On June 4, 2021, Federal Defenders filed a status report and did not request appointment on this matter. ECF No. 697.

The United States of America shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to the motion no later than August 14, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
3:17-cr-01318-BEN (S.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NOEL VICENTE RODRIGUEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

3:17-cr-01318-BEN (S.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)