From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 21, 2015
1:12-cr-00418-AWI-BAM-1 (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2015)

Opinion

          DAVID A. TORRES AND ASSOCIATES David A. Torres, Bakersfield, CA, Attorney for: ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND TRIAL DATE

          ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

         TO: THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, HONORABLE ANTHONY W. ISHII AND KATHLEEN SERVATIUS, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY:

         COMES NOW Defendant, ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ, by and through his attorney of record, DAVID A. TORRES hereby requesting that the Trial Confirmation currently set for Tuesday, May 26, 2015 be continued to Monday, September 8, 2015 and Trial be rescheduled to September 21, 2015 or a date convenient to the court and all counsel.

         I am currently in trail in the matter of People v. Spencer Rogers, BF152669A. Mr. Rogers is charged with one count of murder and three counts of attempted murder as well as gang enhancements. This matter was sent to trial on May 4, 2015 as of yesterday we concluded arguing in liminies. Jury selection begins today and counsel anticipates having a jury selected by Friday, May 29, 2015. Testimony will begin on Monday and will conclude by July 10, 2015. Counsel has subpoenaed approximately fifty witnesses in this case, as such I am not prepared to proceed with Trial Conformation on the scheduled date.

         Upon completion of this trial I am scheduled to commence two additional trials that are estimated to last five weeks each. I anticipate being ready in September of 2015

         My client is prepared to exclude time, in addition we are attempting to resolve this matter in the meantime.

         I have spoken to AUSA Kathleen Servatius, and she has no objection to continuing the Trial Confirmation and Trial.

         Time is to be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act in that good cause exists and that the ends of justice outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Good cause exists for the continuance for the reasons stated and due to the unavailability of counsel to ensure continuity of counsel.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

/s/KATHLEEN SERVATIUS

          ORDER

         The Trial Confirmation as to Enrique Rodriguez is continued to September 8, 2015, at 10:00am, and the Jury Trial is continued to September 29, 2015, at 8:30am in Courtroom 2 before Senior District Judge Anthony W. Ishii.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 21, 2015
1:12-cr-00418-AWI-BAM-1 (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 21, 2015

Citations

1:12-cr-00418-AWI-BAM-1 (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2015)