From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Robles

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 15, 2017
No. 16-10149 (9th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-10149

02-15-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARIO ROBLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:15-cr-08033-DGC-1 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Mario Robles, Jr. appeals from the appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 137-month sentence for voluntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1152 and 1112. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Robles's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Robles the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Robles has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Robles

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 15, 2017
No. 16-10149 (9th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Robles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARIO ROBLES, Jr.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

No. 16-10149 (9th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017)