From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Robinson

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 20, 2023
3:22-CR-119-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-CR-119-TAV-JEM

03-20-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISAIAH AUSTIN SHELBY ROBINSON, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Jill E. McCook United States Magistrate Judge

This case is before the Court on the Motion Substitution of Counsel [Doc. 29], filed by Federal Defender Jonathan A. Moffatt on March 14, 2023. The parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the motion on March 20, 2023. Assistant United States Attorney Suzanne Sullivan appeared on behalf of the Government. Federal Defender Moffat appeared on behalf of Defendant Isaiah Austin Shelby Robinson, who was also present. CJA Panel Attorney Jonathan Wood was also present at the Court's request.

In the motion [Doc. 29], Federal Defender Moffatt requests that substitute counsel be appointed in place of the Federal Defender Services of East Tennessee (“FDSET”) because counsel has discovered that an actual conflict exists such that counsel should no longer represent Defendant Robinson under the rules of ethics, namely Tennessee Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7. At the motion hearing, the Court inquired as to the Government's position on the motion. AUSA Sullivan stated the Government did not take a position on the motion. The Court then conducted a sealed, ex parte hearing to learn the nature and extent of the problems with the attorney-client relationship. Without going into the confidential nature of that proceeding, the Court finds that, based upon the representations of Federal Defender Moffatt, it appears an actual conflict has arisen in FDSET's continued representation of Defendant Robinson. Accordingly, the Court finds good cause exists to grant the substitution. See Matthews v. Davids, No. 20-2216, 2021 WL 3817697, at *4 (6th Cir. July 8, 2021) (“[D]efendant ‘must show good cause such as a conflict of interest . . . in order to warrant substitution' of counsel.” (quoting Wilson v. Mintzes, 761 F.2d 275, 280 (6th Cir. 1985)).

The Motion for Substitution of Counsel [Doc. 29] is GRANTED and Federal Defender Moffatt and FDSET are RELIEVED as counsel of record for Defendant Robinson. Attorney Jonathan Wood agreed to accept representation of Defendant at the hearing. The Court SUBSTITUTES and APPOINTS Attorney Wood under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, as counsel of record for Defendant Robinson. The Court DIRECTS Federal Defender Moffatt to provide the discovery and information from Defendant's file to Attorney Wood. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

(1) The Motion for Substitution of Counsel [Doc. 29] is GRANTED;

(2) Federal Defender Jonathan A. Moffatt and FDSET are RELIEVED of further representation of Defendant and DIRECTED to provide the discovery and information from Defendant's file to new counsel; and

(3) Attorney Jonathan Wood is SUBSTITUTED and APPOINTED as counsel of record for Defendant under the CJA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Robinson

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 20, 2023
3:22-CR-119-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISAIAH AUSTIN SHELBY ROBINSON…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 20, 2023

Citations

3:22-CR-119-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2023)