From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Robertson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 14, 2006
166 F. App'x 953 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted February 9, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Christina Coates, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Suzanne M. Lachelier, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender'S Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-95-00479-SVW.

Before: PREGERSON, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Robertson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 14, 2006
166 F. App'x 953 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Edmond Eugene ROBERTSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 14, 2006

Citations

166 F. App'x 953 (9th Cir. 2006)