From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roberts

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 18, 2016
No. 16-10404 (5th Cir. Oct. 18, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-10404

10-18-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JASON PAUL ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant


Conference Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:12-CR-267-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jason Paul Roberts raises issues that are foreclosed by United States v. Schofield, 802 F.3d 722 (5th Cir. 2015). In Schofield, 802 F.3d at 729-31, we held that a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1470 qualified as a sex offense for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (SORNA) and that SORNA's residual clause is not ambiguous or unconstitutionally vague. Accordingly, Roberts's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Roberts

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 18, 2016
No. 16-10404 (5th Cir. Oct. 18, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JASON PAUL ROBERTS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 18, 2016

Citations

No. 16-10404 (5th Cir. Oct. 18, 2016)