From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roberto

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 21, 1928
24 F.2d 418 (3d Cir. 1928)

Opinion

No. 3669.

February 21, 1928.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; W.H. Seward Thomson, Judge.

On petition of Martino Roberto for naturalization. To review an order admitting petitioner to citizenship, the United States brings error. Reversed, with directions.

John D. Meyer and Raymond D. Evans, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for the United States.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal by the United States from an order in the court below admitting Martino Roberto to citizenship. He was not represented by counsel, and if the entire testimony showed nothing but the facts recited in the government's statement the court below committed error. Without in any way reflecting on the representatives of the government, we may say that no record was made at the time of the testimony, the statement of the case was not submitted to the court, and the petitioner had no opportunity to include his proofs, if such were made.

Having in view the great care and caution exercised by the judge below in naturalization cases, we reverse the case, with the direction to rehear the petition and receive and record the applicant's proofs, and the court, with their consent, appoint Adrian Bonnelly and John M. Di Silvestro as counsel to represent him. It is suggested that hereafter, when the government desires to review naturalization cases, the testimony be recorded at the hearing, or that an abstract thereof be certified by the judge when the case is appealed.


Summaries of

United States v. Roberto

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 21, 1928
24 F.2d 418 (3d Cir. 1928)
Case details for

United States v. Roberto

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. ROBERTO

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 21, 1928

Citations

24 F.2d 418 (3d Cir. 1928)