From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rivas-Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
Jul 23, 2019
CASE NO. 5:19-cr-50064-001 (W.D. Ark. Jul. 23, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:19-cr-50064-001

07-23-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. HUGO RIVAS-ORTIZ DEFENDANT


MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3), Local Rule 72.1 ¶ XII, and General Order No. 40, this matter was referred to the undersigned for the purposes of conducting a plea hearing pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Such a hearing was conducted on July 23, 2019, and, pursuant to a written plea agreement, the Defendant, Hugo Rivas-Ortiz, entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment, charging the defendant with, Reentry of Removed Aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). After conducting the hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11, the undersigned finds:

1. The Defendant, after consultation with his counsel, has knowingly and voluntarily consented, both in the written plea agreement and on the record at the hearing, to the entry of his guilty plea before the undersigned, with the plea being subject to approval by United States District Timothy L. Brooks.

2. The Defendant and the Government have entered into a written plea agreement which has been disclosed in open court pursuant to Rule 11(c)(2), and the undersigned has directed that the plea agreement be filed.

3. The Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea; the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charges, the applicable maximum penalties, and the consequences of the plea; the Defendant is fully satisfied with his counsel and has had sufficient time to consult with her; and the plea of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense.

4. The Defendant understands his constitutional and statutory rights and wishes to waive these rights.

5. The parties were informed of their right to file written objections within fourteen (14) days after receipt of this Report and Recommendation. To expedite acceptance of the guilty plea, the parties waived, both on the record and in the written plea agreement, their right to file objections.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that the guilty plea be accepted. The written plea agreement will be subject to approval by the District Judge at sentencing.

DATED this 23rd day of July, 2019.

/s/_________

HON. ERIN L. WIEDEMANN

UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Rivas-Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
Jul 23, 2019
CASE NO. 5:19-cr-50064-001 (W.D. Ark. Jul. 23, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Rivas-Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. HUGO RIVAS-ORTIZ DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 5:19-cr-50064-001 (W.D. Ark. Jul. 23, 2019)