Opinion
1:18-CR-00002-JLT
05-16-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISRAEL RIVAS-GOMEZ, and JOHN DOE, AKA “MARCOS CASTRO”, Defendants.
PHILLIP A. TALBERT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ROSS PEARSON CHRISTOPHER D. BAKER ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PHILLIP A. TALBERT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ROSS PEARSON CHRISTOPHER D. BAKER ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the government's Amended Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following Documents shall be SEALED until further order of this Court:
1. The United States' Motion in Limine for a Daubert Hearing, to Exclude Impermissible Expert Testimony, and to Exclude Roberto Lovato;
2. Exhibit B to the United States' Motion in Limine for a Daubert Hearing, to Exclude Impermissible Expert Testimony, and to Exclude Roberto Lovato;
3. The United States' Motion in Limine to Introduce Co-Conspirator Statements; and
4. A Request to Seal Documents It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and counsel for the respective defendants.1
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the government's request, sealing the government's motion serves a compelling interest. The Court further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by the government would be harmed. In light of the public filing of its request to seal, the Court further finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing the government's motion that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the government.
IT IS SO ORDERED. 2