From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Risley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 8, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00363 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cr-00363 AWI-BAM

02-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES ALBERT RISLEY, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DAVID L. GAPPA Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Charles Albert Risley


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330
Fresno, California 93721-2226
Telephone: (559) 487-5561
Attorney for Defendant
Charles Albert Risley

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON


Date: March 11, 2013

Judge: Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, DAVID L. GAPPA, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant Charles Albert Risley, that the date for status conference in this matter may be continued to March 11, 2013, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is February 11, 2013. The requested new date is March 11, 2013.

The government has provided a plea offer in this matter; however, Mr. Risley would like additional time to consider the offer before deciding how to proceed. In addition, counsel needs time to review the forensic evidence and possibly conduct other investigation in order to better apprise Mr. Risley of the merits of the offer

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the requested continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ____________________________

DAVID L. GAPPA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

By ____________________________

ERIC V. KERSTEN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Charles Albert Risley

ORDER

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Risley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 8, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00363 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Risley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES ALBERT RISLEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-cr-00363 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)