From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rios-Moctezuma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 12, 2013
Case No.: 3:12CR106 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12CR106

03-12-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVERARDO RIOS-MOCTEZUMA, Defendant.


JUDGE TIMOTHY S. BLACK


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

OF DEFENDANT EVERARDO RIOS-MOCTEZUMA'S ASSETS

Upon the Motion of the United States for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, and the Court's review of the evidence in the record, including the Plea Agreement, the Court HEREBY FINDS THAT:

1. The Defendant plead guilty to Count One of the Information charging him with Transportation of Illegal Aliens for Private Financial Gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B)(i), and agreed to the immediate forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(6), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), of his interest in:

a. any property, real or personal, used to facilitate or intended to be used to facilitate, and any vehicle used in the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information.

2. The Defendant specifically agreed that the following property was subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(6), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c):

(a) 1997 Ford Expedition, VIN: 1FMEU1761VLC19626; and
(b) $601 in U.S. currency.

Identified in the Plea Agreement as "a white 1997 Ford Expedition SUV bearing VIN: 1FMEU1761VLC". The complete VIN has been verified and corrected to 1FMEU1761VLC19626.

3. The Defendant has an interest in the following property (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"):

(a) 1997 Ford Expedition, VIN: 1FMEU1761VLC19626; and
(b) $601 in U.S. currency.

4. The Subject Property is forfeitable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(6), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), as any property, real or personal, used to facilitate or intended to be used to facilitate, and any vehicle used in the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information.

5. The United States has established the requisite nexus between the Subject Property and the Defendant's offense.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Defendant shall hereby forfeit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(6), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), his interest in:

a. any property, real or personal, used to facilitate or intended to be used to facilitate, and any vehicle used in the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information.

2. The Defendant shall hereby forfeit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(6), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), the following Subject Property:

(a) 1997 Ford Expedition, VIN: 1FMEU1761VLC19626; and
(b) $601 in U.S. currency.

3. The Defendant having agreed to the immediate forfeiture of the Subject Property, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture is final as to the Defendant. This order remains preliminary as to third parties until the ancillary proceeding is concluded.

4. The United States is authorized to seize the Subject Property, whether held by the defendant or a third party; conduct any discovery proper in identifying, locating or disposing of the property subject to forfeiture; and to commence proceedings that comply with any statutes and federal rules governing third party rights, in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3).

5. In accordance with the direction provided by the Attorney General and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(6), the United States shall publish notice of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and send notice to any person who reasonably appears to be a potential claimant with standing to contest the forfeiture in the ancillary proceeding. Publication must take place as described in Supplemental Rule G(4)(a)(iii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and may be by any means described in Supplemental Rule G(4)(a)(iv). Publication is unnecessary if any exception in Supplemental Rule G(4)(a)(i) applies.

6. The notice must describe the forfeited property, state the times under the applicable statute when a petition contesting the forfeiture must be filed, and state the name and contact information for the Assistant United States Attorney to be served with the petition. The notice may be sent in accordance with Supplemental Rules G(4)(b)(iii)-(v) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

7. Any person, other than the Defendant, filing a petition to contest the forfeiture of specific property, must sign the petition under penalty of perjury and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title, or interest in the property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title, or interest in the property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim, and the relief sought.

8. If a third party files a petition asserting an interest in the Subject Property, the court will conduct an ancillary proceeding.

9. When the ancillary proceeding ends, the court will enter a final order of forfeiture by amending the preliminary order as necessary to account for any third-party rights. If no third party files a timely petition, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture will become the Final Order of Forfeiture.

10. The United States shall have clear title to the Subject Property following the court's disposition of all third party interests, or if no third party petitions are timely filed, following the expiration of the period provided by statute for the filing of third party petitions.

11. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this order; and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim P. 32.2(e).

SO ORDERED:

______________________

TIMOTHY S. BLACK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Rios-Moctezuma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 12, 2013
Case No.: 3:12CR106 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rios-Moctezuma

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVERARDO RIOS-MOCTEZUMA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 3:12CR106 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2013)