United States v. Rinaldi

2 Citing cases

  1. United States v. Scott

    Civil Action No. 16-516 (MN) (D. Del. Nov. 6, 2019)

    It appears as though Defendant may have filed a Rule 35(a) Motion instead of yet another § 2255 motion in an attempt to avoid the statute of limitations problem and second/successive restrictions. See, e.g., United States v. Rinaldi, 581 F.App'x 109, 111 (3d Cir. 2014) (explaining that Rinaldi had filed several § 2255 motions and could not evade the restrictions on filing second or successive § 2255 motions by invoking Rule 35(a)). III.

  2. United States v. James

    Criminal No. 07-393-01 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2015)

    P. 35, advisory committee's note (2009). After the fourteen-day period set forth in Rule 35(a) expires, a defendant may seek modification of a sentence through direct appeal or pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Rinaldi, 581 F. App'x 109, 111 (3d Cir. 2014). B. Revocation of Supervised Release