From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ridgard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 5, 2018
No. 17-14650 (11th Cir. Jun. 5, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-14650

06-05-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENNETH PAUL RIDGARD, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:05-cr-00193-PGB-GJK-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Kenneth Paul Ridgard in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ridgard's revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ridgard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 5, 2018
No. 17-14650 (11th Cir. Jun. 5, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Ridgard

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENNETH PAUL RIDGARD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 5, 2018

Citations

No. 17-14650 (11th Cir. Jun. 5, 2018)